![]() |
|
Martin's Case — Assault (domestic) — Strike Guilty Plea Client: Martin B., Accused Background: Martin was well on his way to acquiring a criminal record. He had already plead guilty with another lawyer. His sentencing was a couple of months away. But Martin didn't feel good about what had happened. He didn't understand much of what had occurred in Court (english wasn't his first language), and he wasn't happy about getting a criminal record. He told me that he knew he couldn't reverse the guilty plea, but he hoped to receive a better result on sentence (he hoped to be granted an absolute discharge). I explained that coming to me after you've plead guilty is something like trying to fix your own car and then bringing it to a certified mechanic — the problem is always more complicated afterwards. Goals — Guilty Plea: Martin's goal of obtaining a better result on sentence was too modest. He obviously had problems with the english language. Though I'm sure he could have ordered food confidently enough from a restaurant menu, his english was not at the level required to understand Court proceedings. Someone should have asked Martin if he needed an interpreter, especially since they are supplied at no cost. The guilty plea could be struck on this basis alone. If I could get the guilty plea struck, then I could turn our attention to getting the charges withdrawn or dismissed. I also asked Martin to commence counselling with Rene to address the underlying issues that brought the state into their lives. They readily agreed. Strategy — Guilty Plea: I
first ordered a copy of the Information, the official Court document containing
both charges. I also ordered a copy of the transcript of the guilty-plea
proceedings. Having reviewed these documents, I found us to be in better
shape than I had anticipated. There were two assault charges. One was
from the day of his arrest. The other was from six months before. During
the guilty-plea proceedings, the Crown asked Martin to plead guilty to
the earlier charge. As you can see in the police
report, there was a six month gap between the first alleged assault
and Martin's arrest. At the guilty plea proceedings, the Crown elected
to proceed "by summary conviction." There is six-month limitation
period for such proceedings. Martin had plead guilty to the first assault.
It was out of time by one day. read the court transcript re striking the guilty plea Goals — Remaining Assault Charge: Martin was still left with an assault charge. We scheduled the trial for an early date. Strategy — Remaining Assault Charge: Martin
and his wife were living together again and doing well in counselling.
I felt that, on the morning of the trial, there was a decent chance the
Crown might not proceed, especially since I expected to have a positive
report from the counsellor. If the Crown did proceed, I had information
that the anticipated testimony would be decidedly more favourable than
what you see outlined in the the police report.
Judges make decisions based upon the evidence or lack thereof, not on
the police report. We were ready to fight the charge at trial if necessary. READ THE
court transcript re the withdrawal of the remaining assault charge |
|
DISCLAIMER: The
information on this site is not intended as legal advice. If
you have a legal problem, seek legal advice from a lawyer. © 2003 — 2006. All Rights Reserved. Craig Penney. |