![]() |
|
|
Earl's Case — Drive Over 80 — Dismissed Client: Earl, Accused Background: Earl drove a bus for a living. He had a few drinks one evening. Afterwards, he was stopped by the police. They asked him to provide breath samples. He provided readings of 120 mg and 130 mg. Earl was charged with over 80. Since he didn't appear drunk, he was not charged with impaired driving. Goals: Earl was in a panic. If he were convicted, he would lose his licence for one year, and would lose his job. He needed to beat the charge. His livelihood depended on it. Strategy: Earl instructed me to do everything humanly possible to beat this charge. He did not want to lose this case. He did not want to lose his job. The Crown refused to withdraw the charge. We prepared for battle. The trial started and all the evidence was heard. Earl did not testify. There were no defence witnesses. In my final submissions, I argued that the Crown had a good case except for one important detail. Results: The Crown had failed to prove that the breath samples were taken as soon as practical. That is a technical requirement that the Crown must satisfy. The Judge agreed. He dismissed the charge. |
|
DISCLAIMER: The
information on this site is not intended as legal advice. If
you have a legal problem, seek legal advice from a lawyer. © 2003 — 2006. All Rights Reserved. Craig Penney. |