Chuck's Case — Assault (youth) — Appeal Granted

Between
Her Majesty the Queen, and
Chuck H.

Ontario Court of Justice
Toronto, Ontario
Judges Morden, Galligan, and Doherty

Appeal from Order of Justice Guay:  22 September 1995
(5 paras.)

Charge:   assault, Criminal Code, s. 266
Counsel:   Craig Penney, Criminal Defence Lawyer, Toronto
Gillian Roberts, Assistant Crown Attorney, Toronto

¶ 1     MORDEN J. (endorsement):  The trial judge's reasons for disposition provide a detailed and careful analysis of a very difficult sentencing problem.

¶ 2     We recognize that the principle of proportionality does not apply with the same force in the disposition of young offenders as it does in the sentencing of those convicted of criminal offences:  R. v. M. (J.J.) (1993) 81 C.C.C. (3d) 487 at 494-5.

¶ 3     Accepting this proposition, we think that in the circumstances of this case which involved a thirteen year old first offender, the total disposition (one year) is so disproportionate that it cannot stand.

¶ 4     We would grant leave to appeal and reduce the sentence to time served (7 months including the pre-conviction period of incarceration).

¶ 5     We would leave the probation order imposed by the trial judge, save we would delete the requirement that the appellant write a letter of apology to the victim of the assaults.

BACK TO CHUCK'S CASE