![]() |
|
Archie's 1st Case — Drive Over 80 — Dismissed Client: Archie, Accused Background: Archie explained that he already had a criminal record for drinking and driving, but that he had somehow managed to get himself charged with over 80 — that is, driving while having more than 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 millilitres of his blood. If he were found guilty, he would receive a minimum of 14 days in jail and a 3-year licence suspension. He was understandably worried about going to jail, losing his licence, and the sky-high insurance rates he could be facing. Goals: Archie wanted the charge withdrawn
or dismissed. Results: The morning of the trial arrived. Archie, our expert, and I were ready for battle. But the battle was short lived. Archie and the expert never testified. Here's why. When the arresting officer testified, the Crown forgot to ask him about the wording of the breath demand given to Archie. Without those words being in evidence, there was no evidence of a proper breath demand as required by the Criminal Code. Without evidence of a proper demand, the Crown could not use the breathalyzer readings as evidence. It was a fatal flaw. The Judge dismissed the charge. Archie and the expert never testified. Afterwards, I walked Archie to the Clerk's office, obtained a pardon application kit, placed it in his hands, and urged him to apply for a pardon. |
|
DISCLAIMER: Information on this site is not intended as legal advice. If you have a legal problem, seek advice from a lawyer. © 2003 — 2010. All Rights Reserved. Craig Penney. |